Eliminating the Department of Education? and much more...
Keeping it Real, Thursday November 21, 2024
This is the Thursday edition of Keeping it Real with Dave Bondy. On Sundays and Thursdays, I dive deep into the issues that matter most. For now, this show is free for everyone to watch—but starting January 1, it will be available exclusively to paid subscribers.
Lock in your subscription now for just $5 per month! After January 1, the price increases to $6. Don’t miss out on in-depth reporting and real stories you won’t find elsewhere!
WATCH MY ENTIRE SHOW HERE:
ELIMINATE THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION? WHAT THAT COULD LOOK LIKE:
In an in-depth interview with Robert Enlow, president and CEO of EdChoice, key issues surrounding education reform, school choice, and federal oversight were explored. EdChoice, originally the Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice, advocates for universal educational freedom, aiming to empower parents with options for their children’s education.
Enlow highlighted the rapid expansion of school choice programs, with 75 initiatives across 33 states, Washington, D.C., and Puerto Rico now serving over one million students. He credited the pandemic for supercharging the movement, shifting focus to a parent-driven demand for more options. "What started as a slow-growing movement has become parent-centric and is seeing unprecedented growth," he said.
On the federal level, Enlow criticized the Department of Education for its regulatory burdens. He noted that federal funding, which constitutes 9-11% of state education budgets, comes with extensive compliance requirements, creating inefficiencies. "Every dollar from the federal government brings layers of bureaucracy," he said. He suggested reforms, such as transferring the Office for Civil Rights to the Department of Justice and streamlining Title I funding to better serve students directly.
Enlow also addressed declining student enrollment in Michigan and nationwide, driven by frustrated parents seeking alternatives like homeschooling and private education. "Parents are fed up, and the current system isn’t working," he said, emphasizing the need for systemic change.
Looking ahead, Enlow expressed cautious optimism about the incoming administration’s potential to reduce bureaucracy and advance school choice initiatives. "There’s a lot of work to be done, but I’m hopeful we’ll see real changes," he said.
DEATH BLOW TO RESTAURANTS IN MICHIGAN?
We also looked into the paid leave and minimum wage increase in Michigan and how it could actually devastate businesses and workers.
Starting February 2025, all Michigan businesses will be required to provide paid sick leave to employees, including part-time, temporary, and teenage workers. Employees will accrue one hour of paid sick leave for every 30 hours worked, with a yearly cap of 72 hours for larger businesses and 40 hours for smaller ones. Workers can carry over unused sick leave indefinitely.
Small business owners, like Tina Anganis, who runs a Midland restaurant, worry the law will disrupt workplaces, allowing employees to miss multiple days without accountability. "It sets a bad precedent for workplace morals," Anganis said.
The restaurant industry, employing nearly 500,000 workers, faces significant challenges, according to Justin Winslow, president of the Michigan Restaurant and Lodging Association. Winslow predicts the mandate could force over 20% of Michigan’s full-service restaurants to close, potentially eliminating up to 60,000 jobs.
Inflation, rising costs, and a potential recession add to small business concerns, with many already struggling to stay profitable. Brian Calley, president of the Small Business Association of Michigan, said businesses are preparing for financial strain, warning that the new rules could push many over the edge.
Although 79% of Michigan small businesses already offer flexible paid time off, many are calling for legislative compromises to ease the burden of the impending regulations.
This is Michigan's way of putting small businesses out of business. Not sure how they plan to create jobs for those who will be on the losing end. For starters, part-time and student employees have NEVER had health benefits and they know this going in. Raising the minimum wage for restaurant owners is going to make it difficult enough. Even the part-timers and students benefit from this. Full-time employees didn't get health benefits for a long time in the restaurant business. Michigan will just drive more people out of the state.
On the issue of eliminating the Department of Education, if it gets politics out of education I'm all for it. If we are going to level the playing field for students in education, let's do it right. End school taxes for everyone. Let the state or community decide how to raise the money for schools. Lotteries are not it. When the lottery came to Michigan it was intended to supplement the Education Fund. That fund came from property taxes for schools. But the idiots in the legislature decided to let the lottery fund the schools. They still charged a school tax, but that didn't mean it all went to schools now. Let's be honest they stole from it. They have been doing that since the lottery.
The Federal government has NEVER paid their share of education money. It paid all those who run the education department, but never paid the states what they should have recieved. Which I believe was 25% of their funding. (I'd need to go check my school funding information to be sure of the percentage.) I know for certain it was a 75%/25% funding. I thought the states had to raise the 75%. School funding from the Feds runs between 10% and 15%. Nowhere near the 25% it is supposed to fund.
Most of the Department of Education has never set foot in a classroom. They have no idea the costs or how to run a classroom. Teachers in the district I taught in had $50 to fund paper, pencils, art paper, crayons, scissors, paint, and anything else they needed to run smoothly. Anything more than that came out of their own pockets. Money for textbooks was a district thing. Everyone had to have the same textbooks. They would be used about 4 or 6 years and the next new fad would come in. They were on a rotation. If science books were ordered they looked at books that would start in first, second. or third grade and go through grade 12. The hope was they could get them for first grade. Same with Math, Social Studies, etc. Reading books were K-6 because by grade 7 the kids no longer had reading. They had subject matter. I want a member of Congress to tell his office staff they have $50 for supplies and the rest comes out of their own pocket. Let's see how many would end up with no staff. My bet is most of them. No business asks it's secretaries to buy their own supplies. My daughter chooses to as she has things she prefers when working. She buys her own desk calendar and pens. No one asked her to. She just does this. Besides if she drops a pen in her purse it's not theft, she's stealing from herself.
Unless they are going to put real teachers in the Department of Education it's just politics as usual.